Posts tagged as:

facebook lawsuit

A Staten Island man has slapped Facebook with a $500,000 lawsuit, for shutting down his account.

According to a report on NY Daily, Mustafa Fteja, 30, found his account disabled last September. Contacting Facebook regarding the ban only resulted in automated responses.

Fteja, who arrived in the U.S. 17 years ago from his native Albania, said he has been using Facebook for three years to keep in touch with people.

Fteja, who is a Muslim, also accuses the company of religious discrimination.

Facebook typically bans users if they violated Facebook policy.

“If I did something wrong, I wouldn’t come to court,” NY Daily quotes Fteja. “I wouldn’t bother with this thing.”

{ 0 comments }

A case has been registered against Facebook and others for maligning Mahatma Gandhi.

According to the Hindustan Times, the complaint was lodged on Monday by IPS officer Amitabh Thakur for hosting a group called ‘I hate Gandhi’ and posting offensive remarks against Mahatma Gandhi.

The complaint also names many members of the group Thakur contacted to get the offensive comments removed, which was ignored.

Thakur also contacted Facebook, but “their reply was not satisfactory.”

The FIR has been lodged under several sections of the Indian Penal code, including public nuisance, intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of peace, criminal intimidation, and using information technology for these purposes.

{ 0 comments }

Facebook haven’t been kind to those who tried (as they think) to live off it’s hardwork, either by imitating the site or by using the suffix “Book” in their titles. Nor will Facebook sit still to negative portrayals of the site.

Lamebook, a Facebook send-up site, was launched in April 2009. The site hosts a collection of funny, stupid, and embarrassing pictures, posts, and updates submitted by users. And along with the similar name it shares with Facebook, the logo and it’s coloring greatly resembles Facebook’s.

The company is said to have received several cease and desist notices from Facebook concerning the site’s name and logo.

But Lamebook did the unpredictable, they turned the tables on Facebook by taking the social networking giant to the courtroom.

“We’re not trying to compete,” said co-creator Matthew Genitempo. “We rely on people being on Facebook so why would we want to compete with facebook?”

Since Lamebook is clearly a parody of Facebook, it is protected under the First Amendment in the US constitution.

Lamebook also maintains the fact that it does not offer any social-networking service, and so does not compete with the social networking giant.

They finally decided to let the court resolve the issue. Techcrunch writer Robin Wauters also suggests that Lamebook filed suit to preempt any lawsuit Facebook might file and to ensure the dispute stays in Texas.

{ 0 comments }

Facebook filed three anti-spam lawsuits against two individuals and a company for spamming.

The company sued Steven Richter, Jason Swan, and an affiliate marketing company Max Bounty in three separate cases. The lawsuit was filed in U.S. District Court in San Jose, California.

The defendants allegedly lure Facebook users with free products and services that did not exists and tricked users into spamming their friends and used the victims’ information to sign up for services.

In the case of Steven Richter, he was accused for creating more than 40 deceptive Facebook Pages advertising legitimate services. Those pages took the victims to different intermediary sites that paid him for the referred traffic.

In Swan’s case, CTO of CPAlead, a affiliate marketing firm, he created 27 fake Facebook profiles, 13 Facebook Pages, and 7 applications through which he would spam users and drive users to sites that would pay him for referring traffic. Using one of his applications called Quiz.me, he collected user’s information including friend lists, contact details, and mobile numbers. Swan allegedly used the collected data to sign them up for premium mobile subscription services.

Meanwhile, Max Bounty was sued for allegedly creating Facebook Pages that offers users with reward of $250 discount on MAC Cosmetics if users complete a three-step process but refer users to a third-party site instead.

Facebook has earlier won $711 million and $873 million against Sanford Wallace and Adam Buerbuez respectively for spamming.

{ 0 comments }

Picture 4 Facebook Set To Teach Trademark Laws To TeachbookFacebook is suing a small Illinois-based website called Teachbook.com for trademark infringement.

Facebook attorneys reportedly filed a trademark infringement lawsuit last week in federal court in San Jose, California, objecting to the use of “book” in Teachbook.

A snippet of the 14 page federal complaint is given below.

Misappropriating the distinctive BOOK portion of Facebook’s trademark, Defendant has created its own competing online networking community in a blatent attempt to become Facebook ‘for Teachers. Despite Facebook’s protests, Defendant has willfully and deliberately persisted in its misappriation of the Facebook brand, forcing Facebook to protect its user community and the strength of the famous FACEBOOK  trademark through this action.

Teachbook is an education-centered online community for teachers and/or administrators to communicated with each other and also provides tools for teachers to manage their classrooms and share lesson plans.

Facebook spokeperson Barry Schnitt told Wired that Facebook has no complain against Kelly Blue Book or Green Apple Books or others. Facebook wish them well in their endeavor to create online network for teachers or whomever, but they are not free to trade on Facebook’s name or dilute the brand while doing so.

So, Facebook is all set to teach a little trademark infringement lessons to Teachbook. We don’t know what the student thinks of it. But so far, no hearing date has been set.

{ 0 comments }

Facebook on Friday backs Mark Zuckerberg with an official statement stating that the lawsuit filed by Ceglia claming 84% of the company is based on a contract that was likely “forged.”

“Mark has made it clear that Ceglia’s claims are absurd and we strongly suspect the contract is forged.”

This latest lawsuit against Facebook by Paul Ceglia is not the first for both – Facebook and Ceglia.

Back in 2007, a lawsuit was filed against Facebook by co-founders of the Site ConnectU, alleging that Zuckerberg took Facebook’s software code and business plan from them. The parties eventually reached an agreement that granted ConnectU $65 million in Facebook stock and cash.

Ceglia, on the other hand, has an ongoing case against him. He along with his wife Lasia, has been accused of defrauding customers of their wood-pellet fuel company, Allegany Pellets. The company allegedly took $200,000-worth of pre-orders fro wood pellets and then failed to deliver them.

With Facebook crying foul over the originality of the contract, which is so far produced in electronic format only and the current lawsuit against Ceglia, what most people think might turn out true – forgery.

But then again, Mark Zuckerberg seems unsure of the contract and it’s details – I think we were quite sure that we did not sign a contract that says that they have any right to ownership over Facebook.

We don’t see Ceglia wining this, unless the genuinity of the document is confirmed. Meanwhile, the current lawsuit has already caused some problems for Facebook with a temporary restraining order issued by the court.

{ 1 comment }

Could it be surprising or merely a new trend when addressing the amount of lawsuits that Facebook has been up against for patents? On top of dealing with other current lawsuits, Facebook can now add another one to their counter clock! According to Bloomberg the Tokyo based company, Mekiki, has claimed that Facebook is infringing upon three patents in regard to a human relationships registering system. Mekiki is pushing for royalty rights and a court order to furthermore prevent Facebook’s use of their creation. The Tokyo based company filed their suit in a federal court located in Wilmington, Delaware. Facebook has not yet commented on this accusation.

{ 0 comments }

Jack Thompson, a well known critic of the video game industry, is suing Facebook for $40M, claiming that the social networking site harmed him by not removing angry postings made by Facebook gamers. He filed a claim last Tuesday with the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida.

Thompson is known for brining a suit against the makers of the video game Grand Theft Auto, as well as Sony Computer Entertainment America, and Wal-Mart. In the suit he argued that Grand Theft Auto caused violent behavior. Following the suits dismissal, Thompson’s critics have accused him of being a frivolous lawyer.

{ 0 comments }

A high school cheerleader in Mississippi is the latest victim of prying authority figures trying to delve into people’s personal lives via social networking sites. The girl handed over her login and password on request from her coach and teacher, presumably to find evidence of drinking or drug use. Instead, the teacher found a heated discussion of internal cheerleading politics and passed the information around to other school administrators. According to the lawsuit that followed, the student was then “publicly reprimanded, punished, and humiliated.” She’s getting legal help from the Student Press Law Center, and I hope they find some solid legal footing to stand on. The rest of us, take note: Your login information to any social networking site is yours and yours alone.

{ 0 comments }